bs

It's come to my mind that some people do not understand these definitions:

• stalk·er
• =
• ob·ses·sion
• bul·ly1
• sh > bs

<

>

stalk·er
ˈstôkər/
noun

1. a person who stealthily hunts or pursues an animal or another person.
   • a person who harasses or persecutes someone with unwanted and obsessive attention.

The ADA isn't familiar with the legal definition.

'vandalize my car, yeah I will complain.  duh.

ob·ses·sion
əbˈseSHən/
noun

1. the state of being obsessed with someone or something.
   "she cared for him with a devotion bordering on obsession"
   • an idea or thought that continually preoccupies or intrudes on a person's mind.
     plural noun: obsessions
     "he was in the grip of an obsession he was powerless to resist"
     synonyms:fixation, ruling/consuming passion, passion, mania, idée fixe,compulsion, preoccupation, infatuation, addiction, fetish, craze,hobbyhorse; 
     phobia, complex, neurosis; 
     informala bee in one's bonnet,hang-up, thing
     "that new car has become his obsession"

WHO THE FUCK knows what goes on in my head! 

bul·ly1
ˈbo͝olē/
verb
gerund or present participle: bullying

1. use superior strength or influence to intimidate (someone), typically to force him or her to do what one wants.
   "a local man was bullied into helping them"
   synonyms:persecute, oppress, tyrannize, browbeat, harass, torment, intimidate,strong-arm, dominate; More

The SandyHook26 > (greater than brooke.) OBSESSION- idea or thought that continually 'preoccupies' or 'intrudes' on a person's mind. 'the only preoccupation this 'boy' has had in 3years is SandyHook. If one were to suggest otherwise, they'd imply that the 'other' was more important than 20 slaughtered children- and I'd take great offense.

This is not an ABC drama- its, BS.

Like this great show that too was canceled, so shall my charges.  And if NOT, here are the facts. -compare for yourself.  

 

1. April 30, 2015, my car was scratched.  I took to social media to complain.  4 false charges were made as a result.  

2. THAT'S It.  

​It's nothing more than a celebrity bullying her position to claim the West Village as her territory- nothing more than a dog marking her post.

• In her defense, google Brooke Shields and Gary Gross.
• Google Teri Shields and alcohol.

For the record, I've lived in the neighborhood since 1999- she only 2 years.  
It's ironic that I'm charged with stalking.

In my 21years of living in NYC, I've seen Brooke maybe 3x in my neighborhood and by chance. 

• On my way to the pharmacy
• Going to Starbucks
• Donating clothing to run-aways.

The Village Apothecary can attest that I have been a 'regular' for about 15-18 years.  They know me, and have provided a detailed summary over the last 20years,

The Starbucks on W.10 and Hudson also proves my attending this 'store' to work giving a detailed summary account of when I arrive to buy my coffee, and each time I get a refill.  

*****Incidentally, I had only been going to Starbucks on W.10th and Hudson for a short time because my 'home' Starbucks at Greenwich and Bank was experiencing trouble with the internet.  

 

• Parked in the West Village for 5years, only 1x on her street.
• Went to 4 shows, NOT 12.
• NEVER told fear. How, when, where, why?
• Never walked up + down. 

• bs
• matilda
• george.
• blake
• bs/ch lied

<

>

#bslied

the below is a story.  WHAT will happen is that this story will somehow be taken to mean that I am doing/intending to do something ghastly, when I only mean..  #brookelied

​Matilda Who told Lies, and was Burned to Death.

Matilda told such Dreadful Lies,
It made one Gasp and Stretch one's Eyes;
Her Aunt, who, from her Earliest Youth,
Had kept a Strict Regard for Truth,
Attempted to Believe Matilda:
The effort very nearly killed her,
And would have done so, had not She
Discovered this Infirmity.
For once, towards the Close of Day,
Matilda, growing tired of play,
And finding she was left alone,
Went tiptoe to the Telephone
And summoned the Immediate Aid
Of London's Noble Fire-Brigade.
Within an hour the Gallant Band
Were pouring in on every hand,
From Putney, Hackney Downs, and Bow.
With Courage high and Hearts a-glow,
They galloped, roaring through the Town,
'Matilda's House is Burning Down!'
Inspired by British Cheers and Loud
Proceeding from the Frenzied Crowd,
They ran their ladders through a score
Of windows on the Ball Room Floor;
And took Peculiar Pains to Souse
The Pictures up and down the House,
Until Matilda's Aunt succeeded
In showing them they were not needed;
And even then she had to pay
To get the Men to go away,      
It happened that a few Weeks later
Her Aunt was off to the Theatre
To see that Interesting Play
The Second Mrs. Tanqueray.
She had refused to take her Niece
To hear this Entertaining Piece:
A Deprivation Just and Wise
To Punish her for Telling Lies.
That Night a Fire did break out--
You should have heard Matilda Shout!
You should have heard her Scream and Bawl,
And throw the window up and call
To People passing in the Street--
(The rapidly increasing Heat
Encouraging her to obtain
Their confidence) -- but all in vain!
For every time she shouted 'Fire!'
They only answered 'Little Liar!'
And therefore when her Aunt returned,
Matilda, and the House, were Burned.
​

'Nobody had ever been willing to move so slowly.'
Brooke Shields thought George Michael was in 'love' with her during their brief relationship
Brooke Shields believed she'd found true love when she dated singer George Michael in the Eighties.
The 49-year old actress made the revelations in her new book, There Was A Little Girl: The Real Story Of My Mother And Me, and said she was impressed with how 'patient' he was when it came to sex. 
'Nobody had ever been willing to move so slowly. It must be love,' Brooke writes in her autobiography. 

Still a virgin at the time she explains in her book that she found him to be 'a remarkable, respectful and patient gentleman who was obviously aware of my hesitance regarding sex.'
The pair dated briefly in 1985 with their first date taking place on the rooftop of a hotel in Chicago.
She writes: 'He left without even trying to kiss me. I was so touched by what a real gentleman he was.'
The two of them went on a few more dates before parting. He ultimately revealed he was gay in 1998 after he was arrested for lewd behaviour in a public toilet in Beverly Hills.
more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2854367/Brooke-Shields-reveals-thought-love-George-Michael-relationship-80s.html#ixzz47om35Iix 
more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2854367/Brooke-Shields-reveals-thought-love-George-Michael-relationship-80s.html#ixzz47olfL5vn 
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on FacebookRead more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2854367/Brooke-Shields-reveals-thought-love-George-Michael-relationship-80s.html#ixzz47olLaA8O 

Sargent Blake lied.  The first charge stated I was seen walking down 10th St. (to go to Starbucks. I work myself with the sole mission to #STOPSchoolGunViolence.  I sit and write- all day long.  Per Starbucks phone Ap.  My every transaction/ whereabouts have been recorded.)  The charge was then rewritten to state I was seen walking up and down....  Yet another report states at 3:30 I was seen pausing on 10th St. and at #:30 I was seen walking into Starbucks in the same report.  Detective Blake rewrote the charge once he realized it sounded stupid.  He then added that I was seen walking up and down 10th St. 

I must've had my super 'kicks/' the FLASH wears on...

I then went to social media and called Mr. Blake out for lying.  

• He then assaulted me/my car.  punched in my window, smashed my back passenger wheel well, and booted my car.  As seen on 2sets of video- with papers, and boot complete w/finger-prints.  
• There is an investigation through internal affairs and I'm waiting for the detective to perjur himself once again.

The charge states on or about this or on or about that- ALL three statements are false.  Again according to meta-data I can be tracked when, where, how, and what..  
ALL CHARGES are fraudulently filed to recreate a stalking charge.  

​

ter·ror·ize
ˈterəˌrīz/
verb

1. create and maintain a state of extreme fear and distress in (someone); fill with terror.
   "he used his private army to terrorize the population"
   synonyms:persecute, victimize, torment, harass, tyrannize, intimidate, menace,threaten, bully, browbeat; 
   scare, frighten, terrify, petrify
   "terrorized by racist thugs"

When I've only run into her in my nbeighborhood 2 or 3x...  on my way to Starbucks (where I sit most days writing....  My Starbucks Ap can time and place me and for how long...  ) or the pharmacy I've been going to for 20years.  (they too have printed out my entire past 10years of purchases..)

​AND, oddly enough are witness to the 2nd charge being perjured.  

SandyHook memorial items were sent to half a dozen celebrities to for safe keeping until the proposed center- The Center that was voted in April 5, 2016..., where they would then be invited to attend to place the items permanently inside the CenTer as a permanent memorial.

Mrs. Shields did not believe in our authenticity and reacted according to her truth, and not ours.

We cannot fault someone who has been the victim of exploitation from her earliest days to her provocative films.  We understand the 'creepy' people who see her as something else.  We do not. Although she was the most beautiful face I had seen at age 13, I was a child who only saw the innocents.  That faded and I grew out of it- much like one would stop believing in the Easter Bunny.  

There is such a thing as computer forensics which can detail a person's DNA.  To prove that Ms. Shields' is self-indulgent and poorly mistaken, we've offered phones, computers, and the like going back to 1995-6.  

(I only hope Madonna doesn't get her panties in a bunch too!  I have every album of Madonna's in my collection and all the art-work that goes with the albums.)  

Brooke Shields' 'stalker' goes on bizarre rant in court http://pge.sx/1TGE1t8 via @pagesix 

Yes, I loved her as a kid- when I was 13.  But, I loved the 15year old Brooke when I was the 13year old boy-  I also wore a size 12 boys pant.  Just as I grew out of my boy's size 12 Levi's, I too grew out of Brooke.  Much However, I re-approached her to work on a project for Newtown, CT.  www.sandyhookkidscenter.com   and she had me arrested.   

The problem was that I hadn't wanted to act until after the Elementary School had been re-opened- this upcoming September.  We have a website ready to go www.SandyHookCenter.org for October.  And out current- www.TheSandyHookKidsCenter.com has close to 15,000,000 supporters.  The ADA, and I'm sure Ms. Shields questions our authenticity.. however, we have correspondences from Newtown, and one of the family to offered assistance from the White House, and are mentored by a very important NY business man.  

This may be even better a story than you'd hope.  I do the work I do because I've been diagnosed with PTSD.  I lost a spouse on 9/11 who was on flight 175, I'm a Church survivor and we've lost two siblings form violence.  I'm compelled to charity because its the only way I can make sense of this world.  People don't realize that I don't see celebrity- I see people as people and we're all here together.  And to solve the SchoolGunViolence we must be a collective.  


"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane 
by those who could not hear the music." --Friedrich Nietzsche

Listen, Brooke has been terrorized her entire life through exploit of some sort.  'Hurt people Hurt People.'

​My life doesn't make sense, as I do not do what most people do.  Neither has my life been like most people.  However, that said, I'm fully transparent on line, pants to my ankles- dick out. There are no secrets.. 

 

If you are being bullied, seek a friend- a good friend. There will be those who do not want to be 'involved,' and there are many who believe the victim is as bad as the one victimizing.

'fuck 'em' if they can't handle it.  

Find someone, who does care! 

AND if you can't, well you tried...  and feel good about whatever decision you made.  You answer only to yourself! (if you have kids- you answere to them first and then you...)  

  

 

however:

THIS is on line, and THIS is what made Brooke afraid.  I had no knowledge that any smart human being could fall for such deception.  But, they have. ​

I worked with Detective Thomas formerly of The NY Police Commissioners Office and this is what we found:

​

​with 3337 followers since 2011, it's obviously a rag- used to extort. 

• R/O
• Michael Levine writes:
• Extortion:

<

>

  

• Submitted: Sun, January 31, 2010 
• Updated: Thu, February 11, 2010 


• Reported By: Michael Levine. — Morristown, New Jersey United States of America

John M. Rinaldi
InternetUnited States of America

• Phone:
• Web: www.kathyrinaldihope.com
• Category:

John M. Rinaldi Violent psychopath/child molester; Blackmailer and Scam Artist; Flamboyant Homosexual and Drama Queen. Internet*REBUTTAL Owner of company: John Rinaldi Kathy Rinaldi Hope Honorable, Sincere, dedicated to the betterment of others.Print this Report
Email this ReportREBUTTAL BOX™ | Respond to this Report!

Add Rebuttal to this ReportWhat's this?
 
Aribitrate & Set Record Straight
File New ReportWhat's this?
 
Repair Your ReputationWhat's this?
← Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
SEO Reputation Management at its best!

John Rinaldi is a psychopathic  scam artist, as well as being dangerous and violent.  He claims to be a victim of abuse himself, but he is an accomplished homosexual drama queen who both threatens and blackmails individuals for money, supposedly for a charity near and dear to his heart - but the charity is a fake, and everything connected with it is  fraudulent.

John M. Rinaldi is originally from Massachusetts.  He targets both strangers and  acquaintances, as well as well-known celebrities - all in the name of collecting money for his fraudulent charity, The Kathy Rinaldi Hope Foundation.  He lies and he steals and he is apparently willing to stoop to any level or go to any extreme to rip off as many people as possible.  He is well-known to law enforcement agencies and is a well-known scam artist, as well as being a sociopath.

As a FORMER acquaintance of Mr. Rinaldi, I STRONGLY recommend that anyone who is contacted by this unbalanced and dangerous man should notify local authorities  immediately and report his whereabouts.  For one's own protection, Mr. Rinaldi should not be made to feel threatened or mistrusted in any way;  instead, he should be kept at a distance until law enforcement can take over.  In my opinion, he is a menace and a threat to society.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/31/2010 01:50 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/John-M-Rinaldi/internet/John-M-Rinaldi-Violent-psychopathchild-molester-Blackmailer-and-Scam-ArtistFlamboyant-562469. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on John M. Rinaldi
Search for additional reportsIf you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
File a Rebuttal What's this?
Also a victim?
File a Report What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
Get Started What's this?
Arbitrate
Remove Reports?
No! Better yet! Arbitrate to set the record straight!
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author0Consumer1Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company
John Rinaldi Kathy Rinaldi Hope Honorable, Sincere, dedicated to the betterment of others.AUTHOR: John M. Rinaldi - (USA)SUBMITTED: Thursday, February 11, 2010
It's astounding that this site would publish such trash, without first validating it's authenticity.  But, anyone can say anything.. It's also amazing that someone would go out of their way to cause harm.  Those I am most sorry for. 

But, I welcome any and all comments.  Through it's stupidity they pretty much have cancelled their report.  "well known to law enforcement agencies."  PLEASE CALL ANY OF THEM. 

This is the coounterpart to the first alleged complaint.  Since, it was a lie, and fabricated, it was easy to trace the origin.  So, in my attempt at a rebuttal, he in return published yet another pack of lies.

There is no public record, there is no fraud, and to go any further is beneath me.

My law firm is the most powerful law firm in the country- if not world, and will be dealing with this in a more legal and proper manner, and all damages recieved will be donated to the many charities The Kathy Rinaldi Hope supports and continues to work with. 

This will also be reported to the NYPD and I will include their letter for your review.  I'm actually glad the police were mentioned as this goes way past an official FBI investigation that originated back at the first report, now it's at the government level.

And if there was any truth to any of this, googling my name would access police records that are all made public, and there would be a BBB report- as they unlike this site does the investigation.

I apologize for this intrusion.  And if you are an organization, celebrity, family, or friend I would have you inquire with any police agency in the city of NY to see that there is no record or truth to any of this.

Freedom of speech is a good thing, and as a result, you will get those willing to hurt others. 

Thanks to the writer,  to notify authorities... that negates the validity of the entire report. 

I thank you for the controversy.  You most assured my success because this will get the high profile needed to allow me to help the most in need.

Thank you,

John M. Rinaldi




****ALL recovery will go to agencies I support.  Follow the website and blog for details.

Respond to this report!
​

Ripoff ReportFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ripoff Report
Web addresswww.ripoffreport.com
Type of siteConsumer
Available inEnglish
Created byEd Magedson
LaunchedDecember 8, 1998
Current statusOnlineRipoff Report is a privately owned and operated for-profit website founded by Ed Magedson.[1] The Ripoff Report has been online since December 1998 and is operated by Xcentric Ventures, LLC which is based in Tempe, Arizona.[2]


Contents  [hide] 

• 1Reports and rebuttals
• 2"Non-removal" policy and exceptions
• 3Litigation involving the Communications Decency Act
• 4Other legal actions
• 5Corporate advocacy program
• 6References
• 7External links

Reports and rebuttals[edit]The Ripoff Report allows users over the age of 14[3] to post free, un-moderated and uncorroborated complaints known as 'reports' which contain details of the user's experience with the company or individual listed in the report. The site requires users to create an account which includes an unconfirmed email address before reports can be submitted.[3] According to the site's Terms of Service, users are required to affirm that their reports are truthful and accurate, but the site says that it neither investigates, confirms nor corroborates the accuracy of submissions. Ripoff Report has more than 1 million pages indexed onGoogle.[4]
Companies who have been named in a report may choose to respond by submitting a "rebuttal" which explains their side of the story. There is no charge to submit a rebuttal, but users must first register for an account.
By creating an account, a user agrees to exclusive venue in Arizona for any legal dispute arising from his or her posting. In June 2013, a federal court in Maryland found that that this agreement did not prevent a user from suing both the author of a report and Ripoff Report in Maryland, because the user agreement applied only to the rebuttal, not to the report.[5]
"Non-removal" policy and exceptions[edit]The Ripoff Report website claims that its stated policy is to refuse to remove reports. Ripoff Report states that it does not allow authors to remove their own reports, even in cases where a mistake has been made.[3]
This stated policy is disclosed to users in the site's Terms of Service.[3] While Ripoff Report claims not to "remove" reports, Ripoff Report advertises that it will remove (alter) specific information or add positive content to reports for participants in its paid programs, the Corporate Advocacy and Remediation Program[6] and the VIP Arbitration Program.[7] The site represents that all complaints remain public and unedited, with the exception of redactions for prevailing participants in the VIP Arbitration Program.[8] A longer discussion of the policy is found on the site's Frequently Asked Questions page.[9] In May 2013, Ripoff Report started offering a new service called "RipoffReport Verified" that allows paying members 14 days to resolve complaints before they are posted, for $89.95 a month.[10][11]
In one recent case, Blockowicz v. Williams, 675 F.Supp.2d 912 (N.D.Ill. 2009), a federal district court in Chicago found that Ripoff Report was not required to comply with an injunction to remove reports because it had not been named a defendant in the original lawsuit.[12]
In July 2010, Ripoff Report announced a new program called "VIP Arbitration" which has the stated purpose of offering victims of false reports a new way to clear their names.[13] According to the site, the arbitration program involves private third-party arbitrators who are paid to review disputed reports and render decisions about their accuracy.[13] Although Ripoff Report claims to refuse to remove reports, the site now explains: "Any statements of fact that the arbitrator determines to be false will be redacted from the original report."[14]
Litigation involving the Communications Decency Act[edit]According to a United States law called the Communications Decency Act, under 47 U.S.C. § 230(c), websites like the Ripoff Report are excluded from certain forms of civil liability seeking to treat the site as the "publisher or speaker" of user-generated content. For certain claims, the exclusion from liability applies for material contributed by third parties that is false, and even if the site does not take any steps to investigate content prior to publication or remove content after receiving notice that the material is false.[15] Protection also extends to editorial changes made by the website operator itself, as long as such editing does not alter the meaning of the original third-party content.[16]
Other legal actions[edit]Two Australians sued Google over their failure to remove links to defamatory content on Ripoff Report. In February 2011 Dr Janice Duffy filed defamation proceedings in South Australia.[17] In 2015, Duffy prevailed in her defamation case against Google for serving libelous comments, originating from Ripoff Report, and allowing its auto-complete function to assist users in finding the content. As of October 27, 2015, unresolved issues in the case are "...the defences of triviality and time limitation, the application for an extension of time, and causation and quantum of damages." [18][19] In February 2013, Jarrod Sierocki filed defamation proceedings in Queensland.[20] Sierocki won $287,788.00 in damages and interest against a former partner and client who were forced to admit that they had defamed SIerocki on Ripoff Report's un-redactable forum. A related case against Google appears to be working its way through the Australian courts as of April 23, 2015.[21]
In July 2013 the Government of India ordered a block on accessing the site. The block was removed the next month.[22]
In May 2014 the Australian search engine Yahoo!7 blocked the Ripoff Report after multiple defamation complaints.[23] It was unblocked after about a week.[24]
Ripoff Report's publisher, Xcentric Ventures, LLC, unsuccessfully sued consumers and their attorneys for malicious prosecution in federal district court in Phoenix, Arizona in 2011. In August 2015, the United States 9th Circuit Court of Appeals published their order affirming the district court's order dismissing the case. The ruling notes that Xcentric had sued over the consumers' underlying attempted racketeering extortion claim, which "alleged that Xcentric attempted to extort money by encouraging third parties to post negative reviews, manipulating the posts to highlight negative reviews and to further highlight the negative reviews if the businesses posted rebuttals, and then charging high fees to 'turn the negative into a positive.'" "The claim was tenable because a district court had previously held that similar allegations stated an extortion claim against Xcentric," the 9th Circuit wrote in its order.[25]
Corporate advocacy program[edit]In website pages of Public Citizen, it was noted that Ripoff Report has received some criticism of its "Corporate Advocacy, Business Remediation & Customer Satisfaction Program,"[26] particularly whether Ripoff Report sufficiently discloses all facts that would influence the public's perception of the program.[27]
Ripoff Report provides its own description of the operation of the program in detail on the Ripoff Report website's Corporate Advocacy Program page.[28] The page advertises with an illustration of how the Google search results will be altered for members who join the program.[29]
In February 2007 the Phoenix New Times reported that at least 30 companies at that time paid Ripoff Report for participation in the Corporate Advocacy Program.[30] Forbes contributor Adam Tanner, reported in 2013, that the corporate advocacy program ranges from $5,500.00 and can exceed $100,000.00, third-party arbitration starts at $2000.00.[31] The Forbes article links to a Search Engine Land article that explains that while the Ripoff Report is protected under the Communications Decency Act, a person authoring false or defamatory content is not, the author can be sued, and Google can be petitioned to de-list the posting when a court order specifies de-listing.[32]

RIPOFF report is a front to extort money.  For me to have taken this down would've cost me $5,000.00- $100,000.00.

I left it up because it serves as an example of bullying.  Much like Brooke, the Police, and the DA's office.  
We left this up because it was supposed to be an example for kids:
'we as adults can handle a bully because we have learned life skills that have taught us how to persevere and be resilient.  We are losing our kids to suicide from pandemic proportions.  Unlike us our children are still innocent and they believe that what's happening to them now will continue forever and thus 4,400 children/babies take their lives.  

Up until now, I thought we were strong.  

I've tried to be an example.  I am wrong.  We as adults cannot handle it.  So, I'm sorry kids- it won't get any better.  There might always be someone their that will hold whatever they find on you over your head whether true or not.

I prey you find the strength.    I cannot believe I'm not dead, yet.

*****
​The statistics on bullying and suicide are alarming:

• Suicide is the third leading cause of death among young people, resulting in about 4,400 deaths per year, according to the CDC. For every suicide among young people, there are at least 100 suicide attempts. Over 14 percent of high school students have considered suicide, and almost 7 percent have attempted it.
• Bully victims are between 2 to 9 times more likely to consider suicide than non-victims, according to studies by Yale University
• A study in Britain found that at least half of suicides among young people are related to bullying
• 10 to 14 year old girls may be at even higher risk for suicide, according to the study above
• According to statistics reported by ABC News, nearly 30 percent of students are either bullies or victims of bullying, and 160,000 kids stay home from school every day because of fear of bullying