MANHATTAN APPELLATE COURTS‘ FRAUD & PERJURY New York. vs.

JUSTIA / 
People v Rinaldi

Skillfully Created By 

NYPD SERGEANT KEVIN BLAKE .

Mr. Blake misrepresented an upstate NY police officer over an incident that had nothing to do with Mr. Rinaldi.  It was a scuffle involving a pregnant mother who was assaulted by a tow-truck driver.
The driver cried fowl to shift the blame of his assault that would have been a felony assault had he been charged.
However, the TRUTH "doesn't sell newspapers."
Or better yet, the truth didn't register as a world interest event that would certainly ensure a promotion.

NYPD Srgnt. Kevin Blake, claimed the incident was of a menacing nature.  Yet, there was no weapon- nor any truth. 

Outraged over an NYPD Sgnt. misrepresenting one of his men, the upstate Sheriff's Captain produced a F.O.I.L. report to contradicting the Informational Report/ General Investigation to expose Blake's fraud.
The report was expressly done for New York Attorney General James that we were told prompted an thorough investigation. 

It's been 2years ago.  


Ltnt. Kevin Blake of NYPD 6th Precinct 

violated ARTICLE 175 - NY PENAL LAW
felony fraud/perjury.

s. 175.25
Tampering with public records in the first degree
D Felony
s. 175.35
Offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree
E Felony
s. 175.4
Issuing a false certificate
E Felony


AND
GAVIN DEBECKER And Associates' Brian Creter
s. 175.25 
Tampering with public records in the first degree
D Felony
s. 175.35
Offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree
E Felony
s. 175.4
Issuing a false certificate
E Felony

Who misreported a New Jersey State Police Report THAT NEVER EXISTED.
*or there would be a record.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Kevin B. McGrath, J.), rendered June 17, 2016, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of stalking in the fourth degree (two counts), harassment in the first degree, and harassment in the second degree, and imposing sentence.

John Rinaldi appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County, Kevin B. McGrath, J., rendered June 17, 2016.

Judge Kevin McGrath stood in between sessions in the court lobby listening intently as Mr. Rinaldi complained that Judge McGrath appeared to be disabled in hearing, and in site.  McGrath continued to listen to a privileged conversation between defendant John Rinaldi as Mr. Rinaldi was complaining about actress model Brooke Shields manipulating the court in the all to obvious and all too often smile, hair rolling, and giggle as she committed perjury upon perjury upon perjury.  Mr. Rinaldi also complained out loud that every not he was taken was ignored by Defense Attorney Jon Stombely, of Manhattan Legal Aid.  Mr. Rinaldi also stated out loud that not only was Manhattan Assistant District Attorney, Anjelica Gregory Suborning Perjury, but that Judge McGrath was obvioulsly too stupid to care or that he too was bought by Gavin deBecker. 

Judge Kevin McGrath should have been recused, but Jon Stombely refused to make the motion just as he refused to defend the case.

After a nonjury trial, that allowed a compromised and deeply offended Judge Kevin McGrath to sentence not only Defendant John Rinaldi, but also all of us Sandy Hook families and Sandy Hook organizations who have been so deeply further terrorized victims of crazy conspiracists.

Judge Kevin McGrath, convicted John Rinaldi of a heterosexual crime of stalking in the fourth degree (two counts), harassment in the first degree, and harassment in the second degree for asking neighbor and acquaintance actress and model Brooke Shields to attend a Hallmark sponsored event  in Newtown to honor the 20 slaughtered age 6 to 7 year old babies, and 6 educators in the small village of Sandy Hook in Newtown, CT. 

Judge McGrath stated that there was no legitimate purpose to the Sandy Hook first Anniversary invitation.  

Hallmark Cards believes otherwise.
Hallmark believes that Sandy Hook was not only worthy, but that it was important enough to create a unique ornament to Mr. Rinaldi's specifications. 
Hallmark commemorated 26 original one of a kind ornaments that honored each life senselessly taken on December 14, 2012.
That same year, Mr. Rinaldi of the Sandy Hook Center not only held the event that was captured by Getty images, but had also invited several other notable neighbors.

Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick.
Sarah and Matthew have known Mr. Rinaldi for some 30years at that point, and very generously not only offered their support, but Sarah was generous enough to offer her support should ABC's The View confirm an ask of a moment of silence. 
Executive Producer, at the time Brian Balthazar was also incredibly supportive and remains a support to Mr. Rinaldi to this day.
*A member of the Sandy Hook Center's board was Craig Zadan.  Craig had offered Sarah her break through role in Footloose, and was also a boyfriend of Mr. Rinaldi's.  
Matthew and John had also spent quite the night together when they all met over too many drinks and too much of another then questionable smokable plant.  So, much so that Matthew had invited John to join his Children's Young Artist United organization. 

John had just finished 3 months of working with the prolific and utterly brilliant Rob Reiner on the 1992 film, "A Few Good Men."  And although very grateful that THE Michael Ovitz, Rob Reiner, and Aaron Sorkin worked so hard with casting great Jane Jenkins to cast Mr. Rinaldi, John was very happy to be working with Matthew to help empower kids...

And the rest is history. 

Julie!  Julianne Moore is by far one of the greatest Hollywood legends of our time.  She is also to me, just Julie.  After her very famous Best Actress win in "Still Alice" Julie and John ran in to each other, as they often do.  They chatted, and Julie gave John a big kiss as he excitedly congratulated her on her win, and boldy announce that he knew she'd win deep in his bones.
The very day after Sandy Hook experienced the worst assault on our nation's children, John and Julie sat together in front of the West Village's Village Apothecary.  They consoled each other and shared in their horror and both discussed how it still couldn't be real, and how tragic.  John then shared his plans to build a Children's CenTer, and proudly declared who was his mentor/ advisor, and the centre's inspiration.
Julie was in, of course!
*Julie actually asked us to hold on to her bestowed upon Sandy Hook memorial items for her.
We, of course are.

Liv!  Liv Tyler is another neighbor of John's and he too asked Ms. Tyler to join Sandy Hook.  At the time, Liv only knew John as the man who had so often offered up his parking spot, the guy who had helped move in a desk, and the guy who often helped her decorate the front of her Brownstone during the many decorate-able holidays.

Liv was in as well, and agreed to hold on to the Sandy Hook memorial items to be replaced in Newtown.

We were even on Anderson Cooper's short lived daytime talk show.
He too was given a Sandy Hook memorial item and even had it commemorated.  

BROOKE was the only one who was so offended that she was asked to support Sandy Hook.  
Actually, the disdain came after.  
Google AOLBuild and you can actually see Ms. Shields not only acknowledge our work at Sandy Hook, but seemed to be pleased that we were paying forward the kindness her mother had shown us.  

Contrary to defendant's contention, the "reasonable fear" and "no legitimate purpose" elements of the offense were established by the testimony of the complainant and additional eye-witnesses

Reasonable Fear?  She and I are literally on the web at an event Mr. Rinaldi was invited to by Ms. Shields' team.  Had it not been for her staff, John would have had no idea nor would he have been able to get tickets.

S A N D Y H O O K

WAS/IS a legitimate REASON to include our notable neighbors to support a shattered community.

​SPEAKING of TICKETS.
Tickets to any Broadway Show requires the purchaser/ticket holder to use their own credit card to purchase tickets. 
If Mr. Rinaldi was a threat, he'd have been asked not to attend.

Mr. Rinaldi ALSO did NOT see every Broadway show featuring the tone deaf model.

ALSO the only way John saw Ms. Shields in "Adams Family" was after a friend of John's had a playbook at his home with Ms. Shields featured on it.  Incidentally, the Broadway show had also ended it's publicized run featuring Ms. Shields.  At the time it seemed fortunate that the Adam's Family extended Ms. Shields' run.  Had they not, Mr. Rinaldi would have missed the show. 

In hindsight, John wishes to Christ that he never attended nor had he allowed her to self willingly penned an unasked for/ (untold) Happy Birthday! 

Had the show not extended, John would have missed "Adams Family," much like he had missed so many others!

INCLUDING a headlining singing engagement at John's friend Michael's Club, "FEINSTEINS."  John and Michael Feinstein have been friends for some 30years after first meeting at Craig Zadan's coveted Game Night.  It was a weekly game night of a lot of Craig's friends where networking was the commonality.  It was also very fun, and a Hellllllo Gorgeous was definitely a highlight.  

When you have tea with Barbra, walk Ella across the stage, talk hockey with Meryl, help Olivia with a request, escort Mrs. Jackson, gifted a Nat King Cole library from his only son, mentored by Michael Ovitz, have Elton and Bernie sign a welcome gift to you personally, have dinner with Madonna (and be slapped then huigged..), have Clive Davis proofread an invitation, and have John Dunbar asking to meet... 

you seem to see people as... well people.  

Yes, Ms. Shields is a self professed hypervigilant, but in her defense she has been manipulated by her $50,000 - to $200,000 a month security team that should know gay guys don't like-like girls. We certainly DON'T chase 'em.

Gavin deBecker and Associates should also know that at age 13-16,  Brooke was my beard.
I was also solicited to join the fan club, it boasted correspondence, and most importantly the subscription was only for a year.  And any "fan" related ended after I "came out" at 17.

If you are the nation's top threat assessor, I'd imagine they'd have done their high priced homework.
​Especially all anyone would have had to do was google.

beard - Wiktionaryen.wiktionary.org › wiki › beard

1. (LGBT, slang, transitive, intransitive) Of a gay man or woman: to accompany a gay person of the opposite sex in order to give the impression that they are heterosexual. 
2. 'of a gay man or woman: feigning the interest of the opposite sex in order to give the impression that they are heterosexual.

(LGBT, slang) A fake customer or companion, especially a woman who accompanies a gay man in order to give the impression that he is heterosexual.

​

77+ MILLION PEOPLE THINK WE ARE LEGITIMATE

NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL/ STATE OF NEW YORK And SKADDEN ARPS KNOWS WE ARE LEGITIMATE

NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL/ STATE OF NEW YORK And SKADDEN ARPS KNOWS WE ARE LEGITIMATE

FDIC KNOWS WE ARE LEGITIMATE

FDIC KNOWS WE ARE LEGITIMATE

DMV KNOWS WE ARE LEGITIMATE.

WHILE NYPD SRGNT. KEVIN BLAKE
AND US' TOP FAMED THREAT ASSESSOR GAVIN DEBECKER AND ASSOC.
VIOL. NY PENAL CODE ARTICLE 175,

MS. BROOKE SHIELDS AND HUSBAND CHRIS HENCHY 
COMMITTED PERJURY. 

Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Anjelica Gregory Suborned Ms. Brooke Shields to commit Perjury. 

Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Anjelica Gregory Suborned Mr. Chris Henchy to commit Perjury. 

Contrary to defendant's contention, the "reasonable fear" and "no legitimate purpose" elements of the offense were established by the testimony of the complainant and additional eye-witnesses, who testified that defendant repeatedly appeared at and lingered around Shields' home; followed her when she left her house;

THE ONLY eye-witness that said John Rinaldi was seen repeatedly at and lingered around Ms. Shields' home was her husband Chris Henchy.

IN FACT, Ms. Shields' staff- assistant, nanny, security had NOT seen NOR heard of or from Mr. Rinaldi until the Sandy Hook invitation- THE HALLMARK sponsored event was sent to Ms. Shields. 

• The above pharmacy is MY pharmacy for the last 22years.
• The NYPD 6th Precinct, where I had registered with as a neighborhood watch,  is across the street. 
• The Thrift shop I visit once a week is a few houses down, and
• my preferred Starbucks is located at the end of the block.
• ***Never mind that I live a block and a half away. 

I'd suspect, there would be more than two dates on record.  

followed her when she left her house;

Ms. Shields committed perjury- a felony of up to 5years in prison.  
Ms. Shields testified that she was followed to the West Side Highway.  Not only does the local Starbucks have me logged in (on a $3,500 Macbook that no one would leave unattended) but, there is also sales purchase establishing time and a sales person who knew me well. 
If that wasn't enough, GPS had also recorded my movements that later had me check in at the downtown DMV, as did the prearranged online appointment.  

Brooke Shields lied.  And her trainer would/could verify. 
*again, with GPS and Apple tracking I can prove my exact footing, and her trainer would then know better to not lie.

BOYS LIKE ME DON'T "LIKE-LIKE" GIRLS..

OCTOBER 2013

Ample evidence supported the conclusion that defendant engaged in a course of conduct from November 2013

As the letters above state, it was October 2013 that I first reached out to my better known neighbors.
To state "November," is just one of many-if not all dates that were recreated after the fact to support the Prosecutor's not-so-skillfully crafted arguments.

Easily contradictable.

and "no legitimate purpose" elements of the offense were established by the testimony of the complainant.

The above letters prove that not DID WE A legitimate purpose , but the fact that it was kept from the court also proves to identify ineffective council.

In addition to these letters, we had the actual other celebrities that could testify on our behalf.  And if celebrity was an issue, we have managers, assistants, publicists, Network Presidents, Designers, and designer's assistants that could bare witness.

As could Sandy Hook moms, Sandy Hook dads, Firemen and other first responders, Newtown officials, and any of the dozens of people we have been so closely working with 8years this December.   

SHIRTLESS PHOTOGRAPH

and sent her unwanted communications, including a letter with a shirtless photograph of himself 

Jesus Fu**ing Christ! 
This salacious and sexually "THURST" trap- (I'm OBVIOUSLY BEING SARCASTIC) was sent to

EVERY ONE

we had approached to solicit support and funding.  

parked near her home for days at a time

ANYONE who does not drive in the city, leaves their car parked for days and days, and weeks and weeks until one leaves for the Hampton's, or goes to visit their parents.

We ALSO have to sit in our car from 8am- 10:30am 2x a week. 
SOMETIMES we do close our eyes. 
ASS HOLES.

​slept in his car
With a $65,000 car, and allegedly parked 10' from the NYPD 6th Precinct, if ANYONE was asleep in their car, they'd have had to contend with and answer to EVERY police officer coming and going.  Ms. Shields' multiple employees and whomever would also had been able to verify if accurate.

No one could.

ALSO IF THERE was a problem, there would be a complaint on record.

The New York State license plate

IS ALSO:

 R    I     N    A   L   D   I

If anyone was sleeping, or anything else was irregular someone would have made a report- someone other than Mr. Shields- Chris Henchy.

WWW.RINALDIFORNY.COM

​VALUES WE BELIEVE IN

Like Rep. John Lewis, we too get into 'good trouble."

At Sandy Hook, we took on a corrupt NYPD Sergeant- an unlawful Sandy Hook conspiracist, and won!

You need a Representative that won't back down, or be intimidated; that will hear your ideas and fight on your behalf; and who has earned your respect.

'look NO further!

John M. Rinaldi 
for Representative of New York-01.

www.RINALDIforNY.com
​2022.

COVID-19 UpdateLaws & Legal Resources.
Justia › US Law › Case Law › New York Case Law › New York Appellate Term, First Department Decisions › 2018 › People v Rinaldi (John)Receive free daily summaries of new opinions from the New York Court of Appeals.Subscribe
People v Rinaldi (John)
Annotate this Case


[*1] People v Rinaldi (John) 2018 NY Slip Op 50562(U) Decided on April 17, 2018 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on April 17, 2018
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT:

Hon. Doris Ling-Cohan

Hon. Carol Edmead

Hon. Matthew F. Cooper



570473/16

The People of the State of New York
Respondent

against

John Rinaldi
Defendant /Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Kevin B. McGrath, J.), rendered June 17, 2016, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of stalking in the fourth degree (two counts), harassment in the first degree, and harassment in the second degree, and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Kevin B. McGrath, J.), rendered June 17, 2016, affirmed.
The verdict convicting defendant of two counts of fourth degree stalking (see Penal Law § 120.45[1],[2]) was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility. Ample evidence supported the conclusion that defendant engaged in a course of conduct from November 2013 through May 2015 that was reasonably likely to cause reasonable fear of material harm to the physical health or safety of the complainant, actress Brooke Shields (see People v Polanco, 57 Misc 3d 140[A], 2017 NY Slip Op 51348[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2017]).
Contrary to defendant's contention, the "reasonable fear" and "no legitimate purpose" elements of the offense were established by the testimony of the complainant and additional eye-witnesses, who testified that defendant repeatedly appeared at and lingered around Shields' home; followed her when she left her house; ignored numerous warnings by family, security and the police to stop contacting her; parked near her home for days at a time and slept in his car; and sent her unwanted communications, including a letter with a shirtless photograph of himself and an email to her publicist in which defendant referenced an actress that had been murdered by a stalker. The court could rationally infer that defendant's conduct was designed to hound, frighten, intimidate and threaten (see People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 428 [2003]).
There was also a valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences from which the court could have determined that defendant's guilt of harassment in the first degree (Penal Law § [*2]240.25) and harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26[3]) was proven beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d at 349).
Defendant's remaining arguments, to the extent preserved for appellate review, have been considered and found to be unpersuasive.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concurI concurI concur
Decision Date: April 17, 2018