taken by getty images, decorated by John M. Rinaldi
bio:
ADVOCATING
Child Betterment est. 1991,
Gun Reform est. 2012,
Fighting Abuse of Power est. 2015.
JOHN M. RINALDI
Founder and Chief Executive Director
Kathy Rinaldi Hope
est. 1991
501c3 1997
We look to the future wellbeing of children everywhere with emphasis on fighting the many forms of abuse- be it mental, physical, and or sexual.
1991. Joined Young Artists United.
1992. Created Child Hope to combat abuse.
1997. Child Hope was incorporated dba as
Kathy Rinaldi Hope.
by:
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher + Flom
NY State 501 c3.
1998. Kathy Rinaldi Hope teamed up with
Habitat For Humanity, NY
to build homes in Brooklyn, NY.
2002. Kathy Rinaldi Hope partnered with Legendary Film Maker Scott Rudin and with the help of PMK Publicity to honor Ms. Nicole Kidman as we celebrated ‘Women In Film,’ highlighting equality and strength.
2010. Kathy Rinaldi Hope partnered with
The March of Dimes
to bring awareness to the vulnerabilities of premature birth during Black History Month.
2012. Kathy Rinaldi Hope came to Newtown, CT. to build The Sandy Hook CenTer.
•The Sandy Hook Center honors the Sandy Hook 26 who’s lives were cut short on 12/14/12,
•Supports the bereaved left behind, and in doing so •Promotes Gun Reform.
2013. The Sandy Hook CenTer held a Hallmark Cards event in Newtown on Sandy Hook’s First Anniversary at the site of the original memorial.
The event was a tree trimming event to bring together inspiring heroes in the media to continue the conversation of a much needed Gun Reform while honoring the lives lost.
The Sandy Hook CenTer was modeled after the Dunblane Center of Dunblane, Scotland who suffered similar losses as Newtown. Within a year of the massacre in Dunblane, Scotland called for gun reform and changed gun laws throughout the UK.
• Hedgefund billionaire and philanthropist
Bill Ackman and his wife Karen introduced Kathy Rinaldi Hope to their philanthropy arm of Pershing Square known as Pershing Square Foundation with assistance of their chairman Paul Bernstein.
Going forward, Mr. Bill Ackman and Mr. Paul Bernstein acted as our mentor.
2017. Kathy Rinaldi Hope joined Rockport, TX- a township outside of Houston that suffered devastating loss during Hurricane Harvey. We created
Occupy Harvey.
www.OccupyHarvey.com
Occupy Harvey has partnered with Rockport/ Fulton High School, and Good Morning America to assist displaced children and to ensure that they are not derailed and thrown of course.
2018. Kathy Rinaldi Hope has partnered with survivors of The Sandy Hook Elementary School and survivors of Parkland, Florida Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School, political notables and heroes in film, television, and local communities to form the Red Hands movement.
Red-Hands.org
Red Hands was created to bring attention to those against Gun Reform, and assist those achieve public office that are.
2018. The Sandy Hook CenTer was invited to join Alyssa Milano’s movement, #NoRA.
• our contribution was the removal of Military Grade Weapons that are not protected under the 2nd Amendment and created an inititative to ‘turn-in’ and/or a ‘buy-back’ situation in solidarity to the many heroic AR-15type owners who share our belief of ‘Guns Over Lives.’
ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY
BRENT FURGUSON Considers the Dear Friend letter Soliciting/Sending A ‘Sexy’ ‘Shirtless’ picture to Brooke.
FOOLISH, but, I thank him- he’s quite sexy too!
THIS is What Was Considered Harassment, a Hallmark Sponsored Sandy Hook Invite to a Tree Trimming event, by former ADA Anjelica Gregory, and Currently Attempted Again to Mislead
Hon. Leslie E. Stein,
by ADA Brent Furguson.
THANK YOU #Hallmark Cards for Honoring All 26Lives Senselessly Taken at The Sandy Hook Elementary School. 14 December, 2012.
Former Assistant District Attorney Angelica Gregory ‘Stacked’ Charges ‘Based on the Above ‘Harassment’ For Me 2Plead to a Disorderly Conduct.’
*Stacking is a prosecutorial tactic to manipulate any accused to accept/perjure a plea based on exaggerated- often made up charges intended.
When I Said I’d Spend 20 Years in Jail Before I Ever Admitted Sandy Hook Wasn’t a Legitimate Fight, Prosecution Retaliated and SUBORNED PERJURY To WIN.
We Understand Ms. Shields Should be Cautious- the World is Unsafe/Scarry. But, You Cannot Lie in Court!
No Matter the Corruption Within the Manhattan DA’s Office, No Matter the Criminal Acts of a Suborn Perjuring Opportunistic District Attorney.
*Ms. Shields stated in court that she did not want any charges filed. In order for this to be harassment Ms. Shields had to fabricate that it was.
1. Rowan is my niece. I’d never tell anyone she was my daughter.
2. Shirtless photo of a personal logo to differentiate professional from personal is offensive, and a stretch.
3. No one can ‘camp out’ + sleep in their car in front of a Police Station w/out Being Seen by Police, and NOT asked to move.
4. I like red-headed dudes.. it’s biologically impossible. Just like a Certain predilection with George Michael... ‘We’re JUST NOT Into It.’
5. No One EVER had a reason to tell me to back away. To suggest it would be a lie. For Chris Henchy to say so was Perjury.
No Matter the Corruption Within the Manhattan DA’s Office, No Matter the Criminal Acts of a Suborn Perjuring Opportunistic District Attorney.
*Ms. Shields stated in court that she did not want any charges filed. In order for this to be harassment Ms. Shields had to fabricate that it was.
1. Rowan is my niece. I’d never tell anyone she was my daughter.
2. Shirtless photo of a personal logo to differentiate professional from personal is offensive, and a stretch.
3. No one can ‘camp out’ + sleep in their car in front of a Police Station w/out Being Seen by Police, and NOT asked to move.
4. I like red-headed dudes.. it’s biologically impossible. Just like a Certain predilection with George Michael... ‘We’re JUST NOT Into It.’
5. No One EVER had a reason to tell me to back away. To suggest it would be a lie. For Chris Henchy to say so was Perjury.
I Quit Acting in 1991.
Ironically, The Above Lines Were The Last Lines Is Ever Audition.
A Few Good Men.
Thank You, Rob Reiner + Jane Jenkins.
1752. Subornation Of PerjuryTo establish a case of subornation of perjury, a prosecutor must demonstrate that perjury was committed; that the defendant procured the perjury corruptly, knowing, believing or having reason to believe it to be false testimony; and that the defendant knew, believed or had reason to believe that the perjurer had knowledge of the falsity of his or her testimony.
To secure a conviction for subornation of perjury, the perjury sought must actually have been committed. United States v. Hairston, 46 F.3d 361, 376 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 124 (1995). The underlying perjury must be proved under the standards required by the applicable perjury statute. Thus, if section 1621 applies to the underlying perjury, the two witness rule must be met, but not if section 1623 applies to the underlying perjury. United States v. Gross, 511 F.2d 910, 915 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 (1975).
Physical coercion need not be proven in prosecutions for subornation of perjury. United States v. Heater, 63 F.3d 311, 320 (4th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 796 (1996). Conspiracy to suborn perjury may be prosecuted irrespective of whether perjury has been committed. The two witness rule does not apply in conspiracy prosecutions. Solicitation of perjured testimony also may be prosecuted as obstruction of justice irrespective of whether the perjured testimony took place. United States v. Silverman, 745 F.2d 1386, 1395 (11th Cir. 1984).
Because the crime of subornation of perjury is distinct from that of perjury, the suborner and perjurer are not accomplices; however, a person who causes a false document to be introduced through an innocent witness can be held liable as a principal under 18 U.S.C. § 2(b). United States v. Walser, 3 F.3d 380, 388 (11th Cir. 1993).
The attorney's ethical obligations when confronted by a client who wishes to testify falsely are discussed at length in Nix v. Whiteside, 475 U.S. 157 (1986). See also Rules 1-102, 4-101 and 7-109 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, Canons 1, 4, and 7, and Ethical Consideration 7-26.
To secure a conviction for subornation of perjury, the perjury sought must actually have been committed. United States v. Hairston, 46 F.3d 361, 376 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 124 (1995). The underlying perjury must be proved under the standards required by the applicable perjury statute. Thus, if section 1621 applies to the underlying perjury, the two witness rule must be met, but not if section 1623 applies to the underlying perjury. United States v. Gross, 511 F.2d 910, 915 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 924 (1975).
Physical coercion need not be proven in prosecutions for subornation of perjury. United States v. Heater, 63 F.3d 311, 320 (4th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 796 (1996). Conspiracy to suborn perjury may be prosecuted irrespective of whether perjury has been committed. The two witness rule does not apply in conspiracy prosecutions. Solicitation of perjured testimony also may be prosecuted as obstruction of justice irrespective of whether the perjured testimony took place. United States v. Silverman, 745 F.2d 1386, 1395 (11th Cir. 1984).
Because the crime of subornation of perjury is distinct from that of perjury, the suborner and perjurer are not accomplices; however, a person who causes a false document to be introduced through an innocent witness can be held liable as a principal under 18 U.S.C. § 2(b). United States v. Walser, 3 F.3d 380, 388 (11th Cir. 1993).
The attorney's ethical obligations when confronted by a client who wishes to testify falsely are discussed at length in Nix v. Whiteside, 475 U.S. 157 (1986). See also Rules 1-102, 4-101 and 7-109 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, Canons 1, 4, and 7, and Ethical Consideration 7-26.
