PERJURY
With Close to 23 Million+ Visitors/ Friends + Supporters, This By Definition Is A News Source.
per·ju·ry
ˈpərj(ə)rē/
noun
LAW
- the offense of willfully telling an untruth in a court after having taken an oath or affirmation.
synonyms:lying under oath, giving false evidence/testimony, making false statements, willful falsehood
"she was found guilty of perjury"
'Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.'
-Martin Luther King Jr.
Letter from the Birmingham Jail. Jail
NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN /
NEW YORK ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL KEVIN FRANKEL.
Overview Of The Functions Of The Office Of The Attorney General As head of the Department of Law, the Attorney General is both the "People's Lawyer" and the State's chief legal officer. As the "People's Lawyer," the Attorney General serves as the guardian of the legal rights of the citizens of New York, its organizations and its natural resources. In his role as the State's chief legal counsel, the Attorney General not only advises the Executive branch of State government, but also defends actions and proceedings on behalf of the State. The Attorney General serves all New Yorkers in numerous matters affecting their daily lives. The Attorney General's Office is charged with the statutory and common law powers to protect consumers and investors, charitable donors, the public health and environment, civil rights, and the rights of wage-earners and businesses across the State.
ALTHOUGH WE APPRECIATE THE OFFICE And It's Many Oppositions, We DO Understand THAT YOU CANNOT INVESTIGATE Without Supreme Court Directive, AND THAT You Defend Proceedings On Behalf of The State.
HOWEVER, Perjury + Suborn Perjury ARE NOT LEGAL TOOLS 2:
1. FABRICATE CASES,
2. NOR LEGAL WAYS 2WIN.
THAT SAID, Upon My Ability 2Use My First Amendment Rights, (again)... 'if they were honored in the first place, we wouldn't be here in the first place. Or, if several crimes hadn't been committed against me in the first place.. we again would not be here. Nor would I have had to defend myself on-line as a news source to the many people I had been representing at the time.
When a person takes on the responsibility of helping a city, a town, or even a small community after a natural disaster, or even at the hands of human induced violence, it is the obligation of said individual to be as transparent as humanly possible. Full disclosure is also paramount because as unfortunate it may be, evil lends itself to more evil- meaning ill advised people see tragedy as an opportunity. For example, we saw looters in Miami after Hurricane Irma. It's also a great privilege to be of service a
I Would Like to Report the Crime of Perjury + Suborn Perjury.
Ms. Shields testified in court on 18 June 2016 that on 5 May 2015,
When a person takes on the responsibility of helping a city, a town, or even a small community after a natural disaster, or even at the hands of human induced violence, it is the obligation of said individual to be as transparent as humanly possible. Full disclosure is also paramount because as unfortunate it may be, evil lends itself to more evil- meaning ill advised people see tragedy as an opportunity. For example, we saw looters in Miami after Hurricane Irma. It's also a great privilege to be of service a
I Would Like to Report the Crime of Perjury + Suborn Perjury.
Ms. Shields testified in court on 18 June 2016 that on 5 May 2015,
SUBORNATION
|
PERJURY
|
Subornation of perjuryFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaIn American law the subornation of perjury is the crime of persuading a person to commit perjury — the swearing of a false oath to tell the truth in a legal proceeding, be it spoken or written. The term subornation of perjury further describes the circumstance wherein an attorney at law causes a client to lie under oath, or allows another party to lie under oath.[1][2]
In American federal law, Title 18 U.S.C. § 1622 provides that:
Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
In California law, per the State bar Code,[3] the subornation of perjury constitutes an act of "moral turpitude" on the part of the attorney, and thus is cause for his or her disbarment, or for the suspension of his or her license to practice law.[4]
In legal practice, the condition of suborning perjury applies to a lawyer who presents either testimony or an affidavit, or both, either to a judge or to a jury, which the attorney knows to be materially false, and not factual. In civil law and in criminal law, the attorney’s knowledge that the testimony is materially false must rise above mere suspicion to what an attorney would reasonably have believed in the circumstances of the matter discussed in the testimony. Hence, the attorney cannot be wilfully blind to the fact that his or her witness is giving false, perjurious testimony.
Moreover, an attorney who actively encourages a witness to give false testimony is suborning perjury, which is a crime punished either with formal disciplinary action, disbarment, or jail, or a combination thereof. Likewise, a false statement by an attorney in court also is a crime similar to subornation of perjury, and is punished accordingly. Hence, in the professional conduct of an attorney at law, there is a fine delineation between assisting a witness to recall occurred events and encouraging him or her to give materially false testimony. The practice of ″horse shedding the witness″ (rehearsing testimony) is an example of such perjurious criminal conduct by an attorney, which is depicted in the true-crime novel Anatomy of a Murder (1958), by Robert Traver, and in the eponymous film (Otto Preminger, 1959), about a rape-and-murder case wherein are explored the ethical and legal problems inherent to the subornation of perjury.[5][6][7]
In American federal law, Title 18 U.S.C. § 1622 provides that:
Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
In California law, per the State bar Code,[3] the subornation of perjury constitutes an act of "moral turpitude" on the part of the attorney, and thus is cause for his or her disbarment, or for the suspension of his or her license to practice law.[4]
In legal practice, the condition of suborning perjury applies to a lawyer who presents either testimony or an affidavit, or both, either to a judge or to a jury, which the attorney knows to be materially false, and not factual. In civil law and in criminal law, the attorney’s knowledge that the testimony is materially false must rise above mere suspicion to what an attorney would reasonably have believed in the circumstances of the matter discussed in the testimony. Hence, the attorney cannot be wilfully blind to the fact that his or her witness is giving false, perjurious testimony.
Moreover, an attorney who actively encourages a witness to give false testimony is suborning perjury, which is a crime punished either with formal disciplinary action, disbarment, or jail, or a combination thereof. Likewise, a false statement by an attorney in court also is a crime similar to subornation of perjury, and is punished accordingly. Hence, in the professional conduct of an attorney at law, there is a fine delineation between assisting a witness to recall occurred events and encouraging him or her to give materially false testimony. The practice of ″horse shedding the witness″ (rehearsing testimony) is an example of such perjurious criminal conduct by an attorney, which is depicted in the true-crime novel Anatomy of a Murder (1958), by Robert Traver, and in the eponymous film (Otto Preminger, 1959), about a rape-and-murder case wherein are explored the ethical and legal problems inherent to the subornation of perjury.[5][6][7]
'the problem with lying, is that you have to remember what was said. Or in this case, released.
Thank You,
Gavin.
Below is proof of perjury and subornation of perjury by Mr. Henchy, Ms. Shields, and ADA Angelica Gregory.
PERJURED TESTIMONY.
New York County Criminal Grand Jury
One Hogan Place
New York, NY 10013
To the Foreperson of the New York Criminal Grand Jury,
I bring to you an issue to the attention of the New York County Criminal Grand Jury that is in need of an inquiry. This involves the highly publicized case involving Mr. John M. Rinaldi, who has recently been convicted of stalking/harassing Ms. Brooke Shields after Ms. Shields procured a restraining order under false pretenses.
After a review of available information by a host of professionals, it appears that a number of violations of criminal law occurred in the procurement of her original restraining order, and also suggests that the restraining order system has been exploited and manipulated in a most egregious manner. Preliminary information suggests that other private and governmental entities may have some complicity, which may or may not include the NYPD 6th Precinct detective and inspector, a prominent entertainment publicity firm and various personnel from the New York County District Attorney, the New York City Attorney’s Office, and the New York County Superior Court.
This case is one example of exploitation, manipulation, and constitutional and due process violations in the procurement of restraining orders occurring daily in the family, civil, and criminal courts in New York County. Virtually none receive the same type of media attention as this case. The wake of destruction and devastation as well as the untold damage that this abuse causes to children and families is truly shocking and heartbreaking.
We respectfully ask that the New York County Criminal Grand Jury initiate a formal inquiry, keeping in mind that the District Attorney’s Office is the governmental entity who would oversee and present evidence to the Grand Jury, and one of our concerns is whether or not a fair, unbiased and impartial inquiry can be made. We also ask that cooperative efforts be initiated with the New York State Bar, the New York Commission on Judicial Performance, the NYPD Office of Inspector General, the U.S. Department of Justice, Office for Civil Rights and Office of Inspector General, and the New York Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, (P.O.S.T.).
We are confident that if a fair, impartial and unbiased inquiry can be made, the resultant effects will be the discovery of numerous violations of criminal law and serious professional ethical violations as well, that will result in criminal convictions and necessitate legislative change of the current restraining order system, in the State of New York and perhaps the entire country.
We would appreciate a response and thank you for your attention to this most serious matter.
John M. Rinaldi.
One Hogan Place
New York, NY 10013
To the Foreperson of the New York Criminal Grand Jury,
I bring to you an issue to the attention of the New York County Criminal Grand Jury that is in need of an inquiry. This involves the highly publicized case involving Mr. John M. Rinaldi, who has recently been convicted of stalking/harassing Ms. Brooke Shields after Ms. Shields procured a restraining order under false pretenses.
After a review of available information by a host of professionals, it appears that a number of violations of criminal law occurred in the procurement of her original restraining order, and also suggests that the restraining order system has been exploited and manipulated in a most egregious manner. Preliminary information suggests that other private and governmental entities may have some complicity, which may or may not include the NYPD 6th Precinct detective and inspector, a prominent entertainment publicity firm and various personnel from the New York County District Attorney, the New York City Attorney’s Office, and the New York County Superior Court.
This case is one example of exploitation, manipulation, and constitutional and due process violations in the procurement of restraining orders occurring daily in the family, civil, and criminal courts in New York County. Virtually none receive the same type of media attention as this case. The wake of destruction and devastation as well as the untold damage that this abuse causes to children and families is truly shocking and heartbreaking.
We respectfully ask that the New York County Criminal Grand Jury initiate a formal inquiry, keeping in mind that the District Attorney’s Office is the governmental entity who would oversee and present evidence to the Grand Jury, and one of our concerns is whether or not a fair, unbiased and impartial inquiry can be made. We also ask that cooperative efforts be initiated with the New York State Bar, the New York Commission on Judicial Performance, the NYPD Office of Inspector General, the U.S. Department of Justice, Office for Civil Rights and Office of Inspector General, and the New York Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, (P.O.S.T.).
We are confident that if a fair, impartial and unbiased inquiry can be made, the resultant effects will be the discovery of numerous violations of criminal law and serious professional ethical violations as well, that will result in criminal convictions and necessitate legislative change of the current restraining order system, in the State of New York and perhaps the entire country.
We would appreciate a response and thank you for your attention to this most serious matter.
John M. Rinaldi.
A. DEFENDANT'S LAST NAME AND New York 'EMPIRE' STATE LICENSE PLATE.
Who Talks Like That? An ATTORNEY.... Coached. Perjury. Suborn Perjury.
|
|
The letter (2 the left.) was referenced in court, but what was written WAS NOT said in court. Brooke stated 'that her children didn't need any more toys.' It was also stated in court that I was targeting her children, and their referencing 'toys' that were clearly NOT sent to Ms. Shields' children, in my opinion, this was a sick reference to an actual stalker who had murdered actress Rebecca Shaefer in 1989. The man's name was David. In court, Mr. Henchy referred to the murderer's name was John. And this man had sent 'toys' to Ms. Schaefer. This is another example of not only perjury, but court manipulation.
The above letter contradicts what was said by both Brooke Shields and her husband Chris Henchy. It was also established in court that ADA Angelica Gregory had worked with Ms. Shields & Co on her testimony which proves perjury and subornation of perjury. In addition, the following letters were also sent to other neighbors asking for their support as well. |
DEAR BROOKE, HUGH, SARAH AND MATTHEW...
'..........................Enclosed you will find Chuck. He’s a rescue from the SandyHook Memorial and I would like to ask that when the center is built and we have a ribbon cutting ceremony that you bring him back to Newtown and place him in his new home at the center.
Help me fight evil.
Alone I will fail- together we can change the world and reclaim 1214 as Hope.'
Sincerely yours,
John Rinaldi '
|
|
|
|
All 3 Letters Were Messengered 2:
Brooke, Hugh, Sarah Jessica + Matthew along w/the an additional, 'Dear Friend' letter.
At the end of the letter, each neighbor was asked to hold onto 'Chuck.' 'Chuck' is then identified as a Sandy Hook Memorial item, and was distinctly asked to be 'fostered' out until the opening of the proposed CenTer.
'Enclosed you will find Chuck. He’s a rescue from the Sandy Hook Memorial and I would like to ask that when the center is built and we have a ribbon cutting ceremony that you bring him back to Newtown and place him in his new home at the center.
Help me fight evil.
Alone I will fail- together we can change the world and reclaim 1214 as Hope.
Sincerely yours,
John Rinaldi'
Brooke, Hugh, Sarah Jessica + Matthew along w/the an additional, 'Dear Friend' letter.
At the end of the letter, each neighbor was asked to hold onto 'Chuck.' 'Chuck' is then identified as a Sandy Hook Memorial item, and was distinctly asked to be 'fostered' out until the opening of the proposed CenTer.
'Enclosed you will find Chuck. He’s a rescue from the Sandy Hook Memorial and I would like to ask that when the center is built and we have a ribbon cutting ceremony that you bring him back to Newtown and place him in his new home at the center.
Help me fight evil.
Alone I will fail- together we can change the world and reclaim 1214 as Hope.
Sincerely yours,
John Rinaldi'
|
|
|
Celebrities cannot be allowed to lie under oath.
ADA's must NOT facilitate those crimes.
ADA's must NOT facilitate those crimes.
John M. Rinaldi
child-advocate.
WHAT DO YOU DO TO COMBAT:
Gun/School Violence?
'would you stand up to corruption, or just turn your back + complain?
TELL ME- I'D REALLY LIKE 2 KNOW....
Our kids are dying at an alarming rate- who else has done more?
On April 5, 2016 Newtown, CT voted in MY 2012 proposal.
|
|
I've dedicated a lifetime 2fight abuse,
violence and 2take on bullies.
I would never disrespect myself
by lying under oath
2 get away with something
I would never do.
#RYKERS28 = HONOR.
-John M. Rinaldi
Ms. Angelica Gregory, you are a fraud.
Dr. Phil McGraw, you are a fraud.
fraud
frôd/
noun
- wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain.
"he was convicted of fraud"
synonyms:fraudulence, cheating, swindling, embezzlement, deceit, deception, double-dealing, chicanery, sharp practice; More
